Compare
Vanta automates evidence for international certifications. What German audits ask for on top of that runs in KaitoSec in one system: Grundschutz, NIS2 under the German implementation law, continuity and AI governance.
Vanta is a US compliance automation platform. It collects evidence from cloud and SaaS systems for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA and, since 2026, ISO 22301. It runs as cloud only.
| Feature | KaitoSec | Vanta |
|---|---|---|
| BSI IT-Grundschutz | Yes | No |
| NIS2 under the German implementation law | Yes | Partial |
| GDPR with German supervisory practice | Yes | Partial |
| ISO 27001 | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 | Yes | Yes |
| ISO 42001 | Yes | Yes |
| ISO 22301 | Yes | Yes |
| On-premise deployment | Yes | No |
| German-speaking advisory from the same vendor | Yes | No |
| Integrations for US cloud and SaaS tooling | Partial | Yes |
| Integrations for German mid-market IT (i-doit, Docusnap, Matrix42, macmon) | Yes | No |
Last reviewed in August 2026 against Vanta's public product information at vanta.com. Product scopes change, so ask both vendors about the rows that decide your case.
01
KaitoSec carries the Bausteine of BSI IT-Grundschutz, the Grundschutz building blocks, alongside the German NIS2 implementation law and DSGVO as first-class frameworks. Vanta does not cover Grundschutz, so public authorities and their suppliers would run that part of the work outside the platform and maintain two sets of records.
02
Many authorities, KRITIS operators and their suppliers cannot place security data in US-hosted SaaS. KaitoSec offers on-premise deployment in the Enterprise plan, so the data stays in your own infrastructure. Vanta runs cloud only, which ends the evaluation for those buyers before any feature comparison starts.
03
A licence is not the budget. Add scoping, implementation, audit preparation and German-speaking advisory. KaitoSec prices platform and advisory as separate lines in the proposal, so procurement can see which line carries which cost and which work stays with your team.
04
Vanta reads cloud configuration well. An audit also asks for policies, awareness, supplier reviews, BC exercises and management reviews. KaitoSec keeps those in the same records as the technical evidence, so an auditor follows one trail instead of exports from several systems.
05
ISMS, BCMS, DSMS and AIMS share assets, risks and controls in KaitoSec. One critical asset feeds control selection and recovery planning at the same time, one management review covers all four, and the same Annex A control counts towards NIS2 and Grundschutz where the substance matches. Vanta lists ISO 22301 and ISO 42001 as frameworks. KaitoSec operates them as management systems.
01
Vanta's integrations with AWS, Azure, GCP, Okta, GitHub and several hundred further services are mature. If your systems are cloud-native throughout and your certifications stop at SOC 2 and ISO 27001, a large share of your evidence collects itself.
02
Vanta's Trust Center and its SOC 2 workflow are familiar to US buyers and their security reviewers. If most of your revenue comes from US customers and their vendor assessments, that recognition saves explaining.
No. Grundschutz is not in Vanta's framework library. Organisations bound by it, above all federal and state authorities and their suppliers, model Bausteine, Schutzbedarf and the Sicherheitskonzept outside the platform and maintain two sets of records. KaitoSec carries Grundschutz natively and maps it to ISO 27001 and NIS2 where the requirements genuinely overlap.
Vanta is a US company and runs as SaaS with standard GDPR processing agreements. Your security data sits in its cloud. Whether that is acceptable follows from your Schutzbedarf and your own policy, not from a general rule. For organisations that have ruled out US-hosted SaaS for security data, KaitoSec offers on-premise deployment in the Enterprise plan.
Both vendors price by scope, so a list comparison misleads. Put the same scope in front of both: number of frameworks, users, required integrations, advisory days, audit costs and the internal hours your team spends operating the system. KaitoSec publishes list prices per user below the Enterprise plan and shows advisory as a separate line.
Not necessarily. If SOC 2 is the whole requirement and your infrastructure is cloud-native, Vanta covers it. The question changes when NIS2 under the German implementation law, DSGVO evidence for German customers or Grundschutz obligations enter the scope, because those are the points where a second system and a second set of records start. Some teams keep Vanta for cloud evidence and run the management systems in KaitoSec; the asset register is the natural seam.
Vanta added ISO 22301 in 2026 and covers ISO 42001 with the full Annex A control set. The difference sits in the operating depth behind a framework: business impact analysis, RTO and RPO per process, recovery strategies, and exercise plans whose findings become risks. KaitoSec runs all four systems on one data model, so a finding from a BC exercise turns into a risk and an improvement action without leaving the workspace.
Partly. The catalogue is deep on US cloud and SaaS. A German mid-market setup often runs on-premise systems, a regional ERP and hybrid infrastructure, where a smaller share of it applies. Count the integrations that match your own stack before you count the total. KaitoSec connects the systems that stack actually runs on, among them i-doit, Docusnap 365, Matrix42, PRTG, macmon NAC and Personio, next to AWS, Azure and Google Cloud.
A matrix shows what a product covers. Your audit asks about your frameworks, your deployment constraints and your team size. Bring those and we go through the rows that decide your case.
